![]() It is similar to informing customers of the health risks they are facing when they buy and consume alcohol or tobacco products. First, all people must know that they are exposed to certain risks and harm (De George, 274). Whenever the need to establish an acceptable level of risk becomes urgent, managers must be ready to meet four essential conditions. ![]() ![]() Every situation requires an individual solution to ensure that it is ethical and moral. Consequently, it is extremely difficult for businesses to follow any standardized recipes or establish some clear boundaries of ethical and unethical behaviors. On the other hand, such risks can only be justified when organizations perform a thorough analysis of the harm and benefits involved in their decisions and operations.Ĭorporations must evaluate the moral dimensions of risk acceptance against the financial and business goals they pursue (De George 273). On the one hand, in both worker safety and environmental protection, people are expected to accept reasonable harm for the sake of achieving better goals (De George 273). The “Do no harm” principle is closely related to the notions of safety and acceptable risk. At the same time, organizations cannot secure themselves from all possible types of harm, and they must be ready to weigh the benefits and potential risks of all business operations. In reality, “although the harm to be avoided is most clearly harm to people, the injunction is sometimes applied as well as to preclude harm to animals and the environment” (De George 272). To put it simply, many people believe the “Do no harm” principle is related to humans.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |